Two main competing approaches of the business cycle arose in the eighties: the real Business Cycles theory and the New-Keynesian Macroeconomics. Following the seminal papers of Kydland and Prescott [1982], Long and Plosser [1983] and King, Plosser, and Rebelo [1988], RBC theorists consider economic fluctuations as the optimal responses of economic agents to exogeneous real shocks. The aim of these first models was to explain macroeconomic fluctuations only with technological shocks; demand shocks were unnecessary and nominal shocks were de facto absent from these purely real models. Hénin [1989] noticed some attempts to introduce money in such a flex-price competitive framework: the King and Plosser [1984] model introduces financial intermediation and get some insight on the (inside) money-output correlation when technology shocks occur. Nevertheless, the outside money-output link is missing and no quantitative validation of the model is proposed. Outside money shocks are introduced in a cash-in-advance economy by Cooley and Hansen [1989] (constraint on consumption) and Hairault and Portier [1991a] (constraint on consumption and investment) or in a model with money in the utility function by Hairault and Portier [1991b]. These models do not provide a good description of the money output correlation and are not able to reproduce the shape and level of the real variables impulse responses to monetary shocks for a realistic calibration. King [1990] obtains the triangular shape of the monetary business cycle in a staggered contracts model where money is introduced via a quantitative equation. Nevertheless, this quantitative equation has no microeconomic foundations in the model and no simulated moments are computed. Ambler and Phaneuf [1991] also use staggered contracts in a reduced- form model which provides good approximation of monetary impulse responses, but without explicit microfoundations.
Furthermore, the RBC literature initiated a validation method based upon the ability of the model to mimic some macroeconomic stylized facts by stochastic simulations. On the other hand, the New-Keynesian macroeconomy expanded microfounded macroeconomic models with Keynesian features such as underemployment equilibria, coordination failures, market power, real and nominal rigidities and the importance of nominal shocks in the business cycle.