The intention of this project is to take a closer look at the use of contemporary styles for new additions to historic buildings. The use of a new and different style for additions on historic buildings, also known as contrasting styles, is one of the most typical approaches in the field, yet observing the variation in the results obtained when architects use contrasting additions in historic buildings, causes one to question this approach. What is it that makes projects like this succeed or fail? This research, will explore the key elements that allow historic buildings and contemporary additions to work cohesively, respecting and promoting each other’s architectural significance. Using the results, I will consider the feasibility of establishing design guidelines to promote the use of specific design elements for the expansion of historic buildings.
New architectural styles can actually reinforce the significance and architectural value of historic buildings. By labeling architecture as an old or new style, we are recognizing a timeframe for the use of unique and symbolic details that have value and meaning for a specific group. These symbolic details are the language that helps to illustrate or convey the evolution of our society. The styles expressed on historic buildings represent the language of the past and the new styles will represent our present in the future. For this reason, it is important to create an environment where both can coexist and correlate with each other, building additions to historic buildings using contemporary architecture styles with an honest representation of current social situations, while protecting the historic structure which represents the social situations of our past.