Due to social norms, corporate timing, and all kinds of psychological behavior patterns, microeconometric data is likely to be cross-sectionally (or “spatially”) dependent. This potential dependence constitutes a challenge for the analysis of panel data on the firm or private investor level, as it is well known that erroneously ignoring spatial correlation can lead to severely biased statistical results. Empirical scientists have therefore devoted great efforts in developing methodologies which ensure that statistical inference is valid even in the presence of cross-sectional dependence. One of the most popular techniques that has emanated from this research is the calendar time portfolio approach (or the Jensen alpha approach) whose origin goes back to the work of Jaffe (1974) and Mandelker (1974). The calendar time portfolio approach (subsequently abbreviated as the CalTime approach) as it is employed in recent studies constitutes a two-step procedure. Thereby, the first step involves computing an average return for the cross- section of investors or firms, and the second step then measures the risk-adjusted performance by estimating a multifactor (e.g. the Fama-French three factor) time-series regression model.
In this paper, we present a regression-based generalization of the CalTime approach. Our methodology relies on estimating, either on the investor or firm level, a linear regression model with Driscoll and Kraay (1998) standard errors. We show both theoretically and empirically, that this “GCT-regression model” is capable to replicate the results of the traditional calendar time portfolio approach in a single step rather than in two. Since Driscoll-Kraay standard errors are spatial correlation consistent, our methodology further confirms the findings of Lyon, Barber, and Tsai (1999, p. 193) who report that the calendar time portfolio approach “eliminates the problem of cross sectional dependence among sample firms because the returns on sample firms are aggregated into a single portfolio”.