A Schumpeterian view of business cycles and growth, is that recessions provide a cleansing mechanism for correcting organizational inefficiencies and for encouraging firms to reorganize, innovate or reallocate to new markets. The cleansing effect of recessions is also to eliminate those firms that are unable to reorganize or innovate. Schumpeter himself would summarize that view as follows; “[Recessions] are but temporary.
They are means to reconstruct each time the economic system on a more efficient plan”. This of course assumes that firms can always borrow enough funds to either reorganize their activities or move to new activities and markets. Without credit constraints, investment choices are indeed dictated by an opportunity-cost effect: namely, the opportunity cost of long-term innovative investments instead of short-term capital investments, is lower in recessions than in booms. Hence, the share of long-term investment in total investment should be countercyclical, whereas the share of short-term investment is procyclical (see Hall (1993), Gali and Hammour (1992), Aghion and Saint-Paul (1998), Bean (1990), Bloom (2007)).