The problem of debt among low income families in the United Kingdom has received widespread attention in the media in recent months. In May 2003, Citizens Advice, which represents the 2000 or so Citizen’s Advice Bureaux around the country, warned that the number of people struggling with debt problems had risen by 47% over the past five years. The campaign group ‘Debt on our Doorstep’ argues that there are serious problems of default and of arrears recovery among low income families arising from excessive interest rates on loans, incomplete understanding of loan conditions, and ‘socially irresponsible lending’ by some high street lenders.
The evidence on the pattern of debt and, in particular, of debt-induced ‘financial stress’ for low income families underpinning these statements comes from a mixture of sources aggregate data from some classes of lenders, case loads and case studies from specialised agencies, and more detailed analysis of urban localities. To understand fully the prevalence of problems with debt among low income families, however, we need a suitably representative sample of ‘at risk’ households. Such data could be used to determine the general incidence of credit arrangements utilised by households, and to pin down the financial problems that may arise from outstanding debt. So far, most academic studies of the issue have also focussed on case studies of relatively small numbers of people (e.g. Dominy and Kempson, 2003) and/or largely qualitative data sets (Economic and Social Research Council, 2002; Kempson, 2002).