While there is widespread agreement that the value of a mortgage contract subject to prepayment but not default risk should be given by an expectation of the present value of the cash flow, the devil is in the details. A wide variety of approaches have been considered, most of which are commonly classified into one of two categories. One kind of approach has been variously called a reduced form approach, an exogenous approach, an empirical approach, and an econometric approach. The basic idea is to build a stochastic model for interest rates and possibly other economic factors, and then add a statistical model describing how the mortgagor’s prepayment behavior depends on the factors. While such an overall model can be quite complicated, it is usually straightforward to use Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the expected value of the discounted cash flow. Some of the many papers in this category are by Schwartz and Torous [17], [18], Deng [1], Deng, Quigley, and Van Order [2], Gorovoi and Linetsky [7], Kariya and Kobayashi [9], Kariya, Pliska, and Ushiyama [10], and Kau, Keenan, and Smurov [11].
Of significance is that in some of this research, dating back at least to Schwartz and Torous [17], [18], it was recognized that the random time when a mortgagor prepays can be described with a hazard rate model, that is, the conditional rate of prepayment given the current state of any factors and no prepayment to date. Perhaps this development was inspired by the engineering literature on reliability theory, as the time of mortgage prepayment is clearly analogous to the failure time of a system. In any event, Schwartz and Torous [17] used this hazard rate viewpoint in conjunction with a two-factor model in order to present a partial differential equation for the value of a mortgage contract. Moreover, as will be seen in this paper, recent developments involving the hazard rate as a model of a default time in the credit risk literature lead to new results, involving intensity processes, for mortgage contract valuation.