Compared to temporal logics, modal logics of space have received very little attention. I can see two reasons for this. First, temporal logic has its roots in the semantics of natural language; here, the notion of tense naturally leads to an extension of classical logics with temporal modal operators. In most familiar languages spatial concepts seem to play a less pervasive role, notwithstanding the many expressions that could be interpreted as spatial modalities. Also, the development of temporal logic has been boosted by concerns from computer science, in the context of program specification and verification. Here temporal properties are of greater interest than spatial ones.
A second reason is perhaps that it is more evident which ontologies to employ when formalizing the notion of time; apart from some notable exceptions, the standard temporal structure consists of a set of time points together with some kind of ordering of these points. When devising a formal model of space we seem to be faced with a far greater choice. Even if we decide to restrict ourselves to points as spatial objects, there are a great number of interesting relations to consider, such as nearness, collinearity, betweenness or equidistance. But also, the restriction to points as the sole entities of the mathematical model is more debatable than in the temporal case. For, space is inhabited by various kinds of things, such as lines, spheres, planes, poyhedra, etc.