The last two decades have seen a massive increase in both consumer credit and personal bankruptcies. Policymakers and academics have attempted to understand the sources of these trends and the causal link between them. As part of this debate, there has been much discussion about whether bankrupt individuals are (or should be) excluded from credit markets, and whether these individuals have gone bankrupt due to demand side factors, such as income and employment shocks, or as part of a general trend of increased credit supply. Gross and Souleles (2002) argue that demand side factors play a more important role than those on the supply side by showing that the changes in default rates are not caused by changes in the risk composition of borrowers.
More recently, Dick and Lehnert (2009) have suggested that increased bankruptcies are a consequence of increased competition in the banking sector. They argue that improved credit scoring algorithms have helped banks compete and have increased lending to riskier households, which has led to a rise in bankruptcies. In this paper, we seek to refine the supply-side story to better understand the consequences of filing for bankruptcy by studying the availability of credit to households post-bankruptcy. Understanding the consequences of filing provides insights into the incentives and determinants to file. This question is important for understanding the implications of the credit card legislation recently signed into law, which limits the penalizing strategies banks have previously used to generate significant income, particularly from riskier borrowers.